There are a range of diagram types that can be used to visualize sets. However, there is a significant lack of insight into which is the most effective visualization. To address this knowledge gap, this paper empirically evaluates four diagram types: Venn diagrams, Euler diagrams with shading, Euler diagrams without shading, and the less well-known linear diagrams. By collecting performance data (time to complete tasks and error rate), through crowdsourcing, we establish that linear diagrams outperform the other three diagram types in terms of both task completion time and number of errors. Venn diagrams perform worst from both perspectives. Thus, we provide evidence that linear diagrams are the most effective of these four diagram types for representing sets.
|Title of host publication||Diagrams 2014|
|Place of Publication||Australia|
|Number of pages||15|
|Publication status||Published - 1 Jan 2014|
|Event||Diagrams 2014 - Melbourne, Australia, 28 July - 1 August 2014|
Duration: 1 Jan 2014 → …
|Name||Lecture Notes in Computer Science|
|Period||1/01/14 → …|
Bibliographical noteThe final publication is available at Springer via http://10.1007/978-3-662-44043-8_18
FingerprintDive into the research topics of 'Visualizing Sets: An Empirical Comparison of Diagram Types'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
- School of Arch, Tech and Eng - Principal Lecturer
- Centre for Secure, Intelligent and Usable Systems