Donald Winnicott was not a political radical, yet in recent years, as Adam Phillips (2007) notes, ‘Winnicott has become […] something of a counter-cultural voice’ (p. xii). Winnicott’s ideas have increasingly found an audience in the critical discourses of the humanities and social sciences. But why Winnicott now? This article wagers that thinking Winnicott in relation to the idea of ‘counter-culture’ helps explain the recent critical purchase of his thinking. Taking a long view, the article explores Winnicott’s relationship with the ‘counter-culture’, understood as both historical phenomenon and intellectual ethos. It traces his role in shaping the post-war administered society against which the counter-cultural youth were to rebel, and outlines his contribution to a politics of care at odds with the ‘common sense’ of contemporary neoliberal ideology.
|Number of pages||21|
|Journal||Psychoanalysis, Culture and Society|
|Publication status||Published - 17 Apr 2019|
Bibliographical noteThis is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of an article published in Psychoanalysis, Culture and Society. The definitive publisher-authenticated version Kellond, J. Psychoanal Cult Soc (2019). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41282-019-00123-x is available online at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057%2Fs41282-019-00123-x
- Critical Theory
- critical theory
FingerprintDive into the research topics of '‘Present-day troubles’: Winnicott, counter-culture and critical theory today'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
- School of Humanities and Social Science - Senior Lecturer
- Centre for Arts and Wellbeing
- Centre for Applied Philosophy, Politics and Ethics
- Care, Health and Emotional Wellbeing Research and Enterprise Group
- Centre for Spatial, Environmental and Cultural Politics