The idea of instantly and efficiently sharing data amongst scientists has been promoted by Lab Management Apps (LMAs). These apps promise to recreate an idealisedface-to-facecommunity of interaction,allowing(1) moreefficient communication, and(2) virtual extension ofthe community.Against the background of this idealised image of knowledge sharing, I present ethnographic research that examines how lab members perform careful community management, to maintain the specific image of community defined by the LMA. Lab members allowed non-scientists to contribute to theirresearchnetworkbut not to jointhe imagined/imposed community. I argue thatthe politics of exclusion must be questionedin such cases.Writing an app for an imagined scientific community requires processes of in/exclusion to be codified, which can be disruptive to the community. At the same time, this can be a critically productive process that makes visible inequities that have otherwise been ideologically suppressed.
|Publication status||Published - Jan 2016|
|Event||MECCSA Annual Conference 2016 - Canterbury Christchurch University, Canterbury, Kent, United Kingdom|
Duration: 4 Jan 2016 → 10 Jul 2019
|Conference||MECCSA Annual Conference 2016|
|Period||4/01/16 → 10/07/19|
- lab apps
FingerprintDive into the research topics of 'Contributing, But Not Belonging: Lab apps and the politics of exclusion from communities of expertise'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
- School of Art and Media - Senior Lecturer
- Centre for Digital Cultures and Innovation