TY - THES
T1 - Constructing risk and guardianship:
The discourses of heritage seeds, fruit
and vegetables
AU - Wincott, Abigail
N1 - Copyright © and Moral Rights for this thesis are retained by the author and/or other copyright owners.
PY - 2017/5
Y1 - 2017/5
N2 - Recent research has shown that ideas about the past are central to the way
people think about current food and construct alternatives. Yet there has
been a lack of detailed attention paid to these uses of the past, often
dismissed as nostalgic and inaccurate. This thesis examines the uses of
‘heritage’ as a very particular means of engagement with the past and takes
as its subject the increasingly high profile idea of ‘heritage’ vegetables. One
problem facing consumers and scholars alike hoping to understand the
phenomenon and its effects is that heritage discourse is being used in very
different and apparently contradictory ways by a wide range of interest
groups.
In order to understand the ways these different social actors use heritage to
negotiate a place for themselves relative to both the heritage at stake and
other groups, this study analysed a corpus of around 500 heritage vegetable
texts. The thesis argues that the discourse is driven by a central narrative of
loss, ongoing risk and guardianship, which serves to add value to materials,
by producing them as heritage. It goes on to identify a series of patterned
variations in the way social actors construct heritage value, variations
afforded by the mutable materiality of vegetables, seeds and plants. While
some groups emphasise the practice of heritage production and
consumption or the sensory experience to be enjoyed through it, other
groups deploy strategies to make the heritage more materially unambiguous.
The thesis then moves on to examine the importance of the concept of
guardianship, and its use as a mechanism for the staking of claims to
manage and thereby control heritage resources. It demonstrates that there is
a distinction to be drawn between those narratives which emphasise
practice, and those which emphasise material heritage ‘treasure’. The former
work to construct an accessible and participatory ‘networked’ concept of
guardianship. The latter reinforce the role of professional heritage experts,
and the storage of heritage in secure, closed collections.
The thesis makes a contribution at the intersection of food and heritage
studies, at a time when heritage is being used in more and more contexts
relating to consumption and lifestyle. It suggests ways in which differences in
the construction of heritage value have great implications for who is
empowered to access the heritage thus created, and opens the way to
further research into the ways heritage is being used in healthy eating,
environmentalist and urban regeneration contexts.
AB - Recent research has shown that ideas about the past are central to the way
people think about current food and construct alternatives. Yet there has
been a lack of detailed attention paid to these uses of the past, often
dismissed as nostalgic and inaccurate. This thesis examines the uses of
‘heritage’ as a very particular means of engagement with the past and takes
as its subject the increasingly high profile idea of ‘heritage’ vegetables. One
problem facing consumers and scholars alike hoping to understand the
phenomenon and its effects is that heritage discourse is being used in very
different and apparently contradictory ways by a wide range of interest
groups.
In order to understand the ways these different social actors use heritage to
negotiate a place for themselves relative to both the heritage at stake and
other groups, this study analysed a corpus of around 500 heritage vegetable
texts. The thesis argues that the discourse is driven by a central narrative of
loss, ongoing risk and guardianship, which serves to add value to materials,
by producing them as heritage. It goes on to identify a series of patterned
variations in the way social actors construct heritage value, variations
afforded by the mutable materiality of vegetables, seeds and plants. While
some groups emphasise the practice of heritage production and
consumption or the sensory experience to be enjoyed through it, other
groups deploy strategies to make the heritage more materially unambiguous.
The thesis then moves on to examine the importance of the concept of
guardianship, and its use as a mechanism for the staking of claims to
manage and thereby control heritage resources. It demonstrates that there is
a distinction to be drawn between those narratives which emphasise
practice, and those which emphasise material heritage ‘treasure’. The former
work to construct an accessible and participatory ‘networked’ concept of
guardianship. The latter reinforce the role of professional heritage experts,
and the storage of heritage in secure, closed collections.
The thesis makes a contribution at the intersection of food and heritage
studies, at a time when heritage is being used in more and more contexts
relating to consumption and lifestyle. It suggests ways in which differences in
the construction of heritage value have great implications for who is
empowered to access the heritage thus created, and opens the way to
further research into the ways heritage is being used in healthy eating,
environmentalist and urban regeneration contexts.
M3 - Doctoral Thesis
ER -