TY - JOUR
T1 - Communicating Consent in Sport
T2 - A Typological Model of Athletes’ Consent Practices within Combat Sports
AU - Channon, Alex
AU - Matthews, Christopher
PY - 2021/10/6
Y1 - 2021/10/6
N2 - This paper provides a systematic attempt to empirically describe the ways in which athletes’ consent to take part in sport is socially constructed, communicated, and understood by others. Due to a notable lack of prior research on this topic, we draw on insights from sex research to theorise consent as a communicative social practice, specifically applying this notion to interpreting the world of competitive combat sports. To do so, we combine data from across numerous studies using the method of concatenated exploration, producing a post-hoc, longitudinal, cross-contextual qualitative analysis of the ways in which consent is practiced in such settings. We then outline a four-point typology of how consent is performed, including the following categories: overt communication; subtle communication; assumed consent; and deferred consent. We conclude by arguing that the apparent predominance of subtle, assumed and deferred consent presents some worrying implications for athletes’ freedom, potentially undermining the morally transformative potential of consent within these ostensibly ‘violent’, often injurious sports contexts.
AB - This paper provides a systematic attempt to empirically describe the ways in which athletes’ consent to take part in sport is socially constructed, communicated, and understood by others. Due to a notable lack of prior research on this topic, we draw on insights from sex research to theorise consent as a communicative social practice, specifically applying this notion to interpreting the world of competitive combat sports. To do so, we combine data from across numerous studies using the method of concatenated exploration, producing a post-hoc, longitudinal, cross-contextual qualitative analysis of the ways in which consent is practiced in such settings. We then outline a four-point typology of how consent is performed, including the following categories: overt communication; subtle communication; assumed consent; and deferred consent. We conclude by arguing that the apparent predominance of subtle, assumed and deferred consent presents some worrying implications for athletes’ freedom, potentially undermining the morally transformative potential of consent within these ostensibly ‘violent’, often injurious sports contexts.
KW - Consent
KW - Combat Sports
KW - Martial Arts
KW - Violence
KW - Injury
KW - Risk
KW - combat sports
KW - martial arts
KW - risk
KW - injury
KW - consent
KW - violence
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85116469722&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/10126902211043992
DO - 10.1177/10126902211043992
M3 - Article
VL - 57
SP - 899
EP - 917
JO - International Review for the Sociology of Sport
JF - International Review for the Sociology of Sport
SN - 1461-7218
IS - 6
ER -